IBISWorld’s 2026 AU Top 100 Manufacturers List

IBISWorld’s 2026 AU Top 100 Manufacturers List

Written by

IBISWorld

IBISWorld
Industry research you can trust Published 29 Oct 2026 Read time: 13

Published on

29 Oct 2026

Read time

13 minutes

Something went wrong. Please try again later!

Download Now

Discover more in the top 100 Manufacturers list here

Form submitted

Thank you! Your download will begin automatically.

Key Takeaways

  • Record gold prices reshaped the top of the list. The Perth Mint moved past Ampol into first place, while precious-metal refiner Pallion almost doubled its revenue.
  • The Top 100 earned a combined $395.7 billion, up from $376.0 billion the previous year. But the growth was uneven, splitting the sector into clear winners and losers.
  • Defence manufacturers and companies growing by acquisition rose strongly. By contrast, fuel refiners, steelmakers and COVID-era pharmaceutical product manufacturers went backwards.

IBISWorld's 2026 Top 100 Manufacturers List spans 62 industries, the same breadth as last year. The Meat Processing industry is now the most represented industry on the list, with six companies, narrowly ahead of the Pharmaceutical Product Manufacturing industry. Taken together, the top 100 manufacturers earned approximately $395.7 billion in 2025, up from $376.0 billion the previous year. However, this headline growth masks that the sector is pulling in two directions at once. Commodity processors and defence contractors enjoyed a strong year, fuelling this growth, while fuel refiners, steelmakers and the pharmaceutical product manufacturers that found success during the pandemic experienced a major slowdown.

The Top 100 made about $15.6 billion in after-tax profit and employed roughly 409,000 people. Victoria accounts for the largest share of revenue, at $156.9 billion, or 40% of the list, while New South Wales is home to the most companies, at 47. Western Australia’s presence is smaller in number but heavy in value, reflecting the concentration of gold refining and alumina production in the state.

Donut chart titled "Where the Top 100's Revenue Sits," showing each state and territory's share of total Top 100 revenue, with company counts and total revenue. The subtitle notes that Victoria's strong base as a manufacturing hub puts it above New South Wales despite its lower population share. Victoria holds the largest share at 39.7% (31 companies, $156,947 million), followed closely by New South Wales at 38.0% (47 companies, $150,171 million). Western Australia accounts for 13.2% (6 companies, $52,243 million), Queensland 6.2% (8 companies, $24,361 million), South Australia 2.4% (5 companies, $9,435 million), Tasmania 0.4% (2 companies, $1,617 million) and the Australian Capital Territory 0.2% (1 company, $893 million).

Gold overtakes oil at the top

The most visible change this year occurred at the top. The price of gold climbed to a series of record highs through 2025, driven by heavy buying from central banks and investors seeking a safe-haven asset amid global uncertainty. Because a precious-metals refiner’s revenue moves with the price of the metal it handles, the surge fed straight through to Australia’s two large gold refiners.

The Perth Mint, whose activities primarily consist of refining and trading gold and other precious metals, ranked number one on the 2026 Top 100 list on the back of a 29.9% jump in its revenue to just under $33.0 billion. Pallion, Australia’s largest precious-metals refiner, almost doubled its revenue to $18.4 billion and climbed to sixth place. Both businesses turn over very large sums at slim margins, so their figures are better read as a measure of gold’s strength in price than as a leap in profitability. Even so, the sheer size of the increase carried them strongly up the list.

In taking the top spot, The Perth Mint displaced Ampol (2nd), the fuel refiner and retailer that led the 2025 list. Ampol’s revenue slipped by 10.3%, though there’s more to the story than this headline figure would suggest. Even as lower oil prices reduced the value of fuel sold, the company’s Lytton refinery earned wider margins per litre, meaning underlying earnings held up while revenue dipped.

Dual-axis line chart titled "Gold Prices Soared as Oil Prices Eased," comparing average annual gold prices in US dollars per ounce (left axis, solid navy line) with average annual Brent crude oil prices in US dollars per barrel (right axis, dashed purple line) from 2016 to 2025. Gold holds flat near US$1,250 from 2016 to 2018, rises to about US$1,770 in 2020, stays around US$1,800 through 2022, then climbs steeply to roughly US$1,940 in 2023, US$2,390 in 2024 and about US$3,430 in 2025. Brent crude rises from about US$44 in 2016 to US$72 in 2018, falls to about US$42 in 2020, peaks near US$101 in 2022, then eases to about US$82 in 2023, US$80 in 2024 and US$69 in 2025. The subtitle notes that the soaring gold price reshaped the Top 100 list and drove The Perth Mint to first place. Sources are the World Gold Council and LBMA for gold, and the U.S. Energy Information Administration for Brent crude; 2025 figures are preliminary.

Beyond gold: a two-speed metals sector

Looking beyond gold, the broader metals sector moved in multiple directions. Among the winners, diversified miner South32, ranked tenth, lifted its revenue by 19.1% on the back of higher realised alumina prices, and Sun Metals (58th) grew by almost 50% after expanding its zinc refinery in Townsville, QLD.

Steelmakers went the other way. BlueScope Steel (7th), Liberty Steel Group (18th) and InfraBuild (19th) all recorded year-on-year revenue declines as domestic construction activity softened and imported steel undercut domestic supply for local builds. The troubled Whyalla steelworks spent much of the year in administration. Feeling the brunt of high operating costs and intense competition from China, zinc and lead smelter Nyrstar Australia (100th) also struggled, needing a government support package to remain operational.

Gold refiners’ near-term outlook depends on whether prices hold. For the rest of the sector, the Commonwealth’s Future Made in Australia program, which offers incentives to process critical minerals and produce green metals, will lend support once its measures take effect from 2027-28.

Bar chart titled "A Two-Speed Metals Sector," showing revenue change (%) for 12 metals companies. The subtitle notes that divergent commodity price trends drove revenue movements, with gold creating winners and steel creating losers. Six companies recorded revenue growth: Pallion (92.7%), Sun Metals (48.4%), The Perth Mint (29.9%), MML Holdings (21.9%), South32 (19.1%) and NEPEAN Group (14.5%). Six recorded declines: BlueScope Steel (-4.5%), Alcoa (-5.7%), Southern Steel (-7.4%), Liberty Steel (-8.2%), InfraBuild (-8.4%) and Nyrstar (-10.2%).

Food: a steady backbone

Outside the volatility in metals, food manufacturing remains the steady core of the Top 100. On the global stage, Australia remains a premium producer of high-quality meat. Meat processing is the single most-represented industry in the Top 100, with six companies, led by JBS Australia in eighth place, which recorded a 17.3% rise in revenue. Thomas Foods International (21st) and Teys Australia (22nd) sit close behind, having seen similar revenue growth over the year. All three benefited from record beef exports through 2025 as a rebuilt national cattle population met strong overseas demand. The United States was a major buyer, with a fall in its domestic beef production over the year to a multi-decade low contributing to robust demand for Australian beef.

Line chart titled "Beef Exports Hit a Record High in 2025," showing shipped beef weight in thousands of tonnes from 2016 to 2025. The subtitle notes that strong overseas demand, particularly from the United States, bolstered beef exports over 2025. Exports hold steady at about 1,010,000 to 1,020,000 tonnes in 2016 and 2017, rise to a peak of about 1,230,000 tonnes in 2019, then fall to about 1,050,000 tonnes in 2020 and a low of roughly 850,000 tonnes in 2022. They then climb sharply to about 1,080,000 tonnes in 2023 and 1,340,000 tonnes in 2024, reaching a record 1.55 million tonnes in 2025, which is highlighted on the chart. Sources are Meat & Livestock Australia and the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.

Healthcare shows steady demand and a COVID-19 hangover

Pharmaceutical and medical-device manufacturing emerged with very different results over the year. On one side, CSL (3rd), the largest pharmaceutical product manufacturer on the list, grew its revenue by 5.1% on the strength of its plasma therapies, gene therapy products and confirmed plans to spin off its Seqirus vaccine business as a standalone company. Device makers also did well. ResMed Australia (24th), which makes sleep-apnoea equipment, grew its revenue by 15.7% and hearing-implant maker Cochlear (40th) recorded a 5.7% revenue uplift. ResMed Australia’s results run against the common assumption that weight-loss drugs would erode demand for its products; in practice, the drugs have drawn more people into screening for sleep disorders.

On the other side sits Pfizer Australia (88th). Year on year, its revenue fell 25.2%, the largest drop on the list, driven by unwinding demand for its COVID-19 vaccine and antiviral treatments. AstraZeneca Holdings’ Australian arm (85th) also faced unwinding demand, but its revenue only fell by 7.8%, reflecting the more stable mix of pharmaceutical products in its Australian operations compared with Pfizer Australia’s greater exposure to declining COVID-19-related demand.  

Bar chart titled "Healthcare: Winners and Losers," showing revenue change (%) for seven healthcare companies. The subtitle notes that unwinding pandemic-era demand is putting major pharmaceutical manufacturers like Pfizer on the backfoot. Five companies recorded revenue growth: ResMed (15.7%), Kirin (9.0%), Cochlear (5.7%), CSL (5.1%) and Baxter (1.1%). Two recorded declines: AstraZeneca (-7.8%) and Pfizer (-25.2%), the largest drop on the chart.

Underpinning the steadier names is a long-running demographic shift. Approximately 4.9 million Australians are now aged over 65, close to 17% of the population, and that share is continuing to climb, expected to exceed 23% of the population by 2062-63. An ageing population supports durable demand for medicines, implants and other medical equipment, which helps explain why the healthcare sector’s underlying performers grew even as its pandemic winners retreated.

Defence: a clean sweep for shipbuilders

Defence manufacturing was one of the clearest sector winners. Every company on the list involved in shipbuilding recorded revenue growth: BAE Systems Australia (34th) grew by 12.8%, Austal (50th) by 20.4%, Thales Australia (56th) by 14.2% and ASC (74th) by 15.8%. The two aircraft manufacturers on the list, Boeing Australia (48th) and Lockheed Martin Australia (83rd), also grew.

Grouped bar chart titled "Shipbuilders and Aircraft Manufacturers Soared to New Heights in 2025," comparing revenue in millions of dollars for six defence-related manufacturers in 2024 (navy bars) and 2025 (purple bars). The subtitle notes that strong government spending bolstered revenue for defence-related manufacturing, with shipbuilding standing out as the most prominent sector winner. All six companies grew revenue: BAE Systems rose from $2,456 million to $2,769 million, Boeing from $1,778 million to $1,995 million, Austal from $1,554 million to $1,870 million, Thales from $1,452 million to $1,658 million, ASC from $844 million to $977 million, and Lockheed Martin from $819 million to $893 million.

Government spending was the prominent driver behind this growth. According to SIPRI data, Australia's defence spending reached $56.1 billion in 2025-26, about 1.9% of GDP, and has grown by more than half over the past seven years. Broader definitions put the figure higher, at close to $59.0 billion once agencies like the Australian Signals Directorate and the Australian Submarine Agency are included and around $63.2 billion across the full defence portfolio. Much of the work flows through the AUKUS submarine program, a commitment worth up to $368.0 billion over its life, which is generating activity at the Osborne shipyard in South Australia and Henderson in Western Australia.

Combined bar and line chart titled "Defence Spending Is Climbing," showing defence spending in billions of dollars (bars, left axis) and defence spending as a share of GDP (pink line, right axis) from 2018-19 to 2025-26. The subtitle notes that defence spending continues to grow consistently, supported by spending on the AUKUS submarine program. Spending rises every year: $36.7 billion in 2018-19, $38.3 billion in 2019-20, $41.0 billion in 2020-21, $46.1 billion in 2021-22, $47.4 billion in 2022-23, $50.2 billion in 2023-24, $53.5 billion in 2024-25 and $56.1 billion in 2025-26. The share of GDP stays relatively stable at around 1.9%, peaking at about 2.0% in 2020-21, dipping to about 1.86% in 2023-24, then edging back up to roughly 1.9% by 2025-26. Source: SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, 2025.

Each company's 2025 revenue was underpinned by a specific slice of this government spending pipeline. BAE Systems Australia ramped up construction of the first of six Hunter-class frigates at Osborne, begun in 2024, with the first ship due in the early 2030s. ASC's growth came from expanding submarine sustainment work, ahead of the $11.0 billion Collins-class life extension program that began in 2026. Austal's 2025 revenue grew on the back of its US shipbuilding work. Thales Australia, which builds Bushmaster vehicles and munitions, was lifted by fresh 2025 orders, including 44 more Bushmasters as well as steady munitions production.

Defence contracts often run for many years, even decades, and the revenue they provide depends on political commitments holding. A United States review of AUKUS in 2025 created a period of uncertainty before the pathway was formalised. Disruption can also come from overseas ownership risk, like South Korea’s Hanwha, which spent the year increasing its shareholding in Austal. For now, though, the direction of defence spending is clear – and it’s feeding straight into the order books of Australian defence manufacturers.

Building products and the deals that rearranged the ranks

Building product manufacturers performed well in 2025. However, much of their growth stemmed from corporate deals rather than everyday building activities, a dynamic that explains some of the largest moves on the Top 100 list.

James Hardie Industries, a fibre cement manufacturer, saw revenue growth of 23.1%, moving it to 12th place. The rise, however, had little to do with higher sales of cladding (which were largely flat), the segment from which the company derives most of its revenue, and instead reflected a major revenue lift from its purchase of AZEK, a US decking and outdoor-living company. This purchase was completed in July 2025 and is included in the year's revenue.  

Two other companies similarly gained from acquisitions. Saint Gobain (37th) doubled its revenue after taking in CSR, a Gyprock plasterboard maker, and CRH (47th) more than matched this revenue growth rate when it absorbed the cement and lime producer Adbri. Their revenue growth rates were the steepest on the list. Amcor (4th) is another example of a company that achieved revenue growth, though at a lower 10.5%, when it landed a merger with the US packaging group Berry. What these examples show is not necessarily a booming market but one where companies are growing by swallowing or merging with others, the same move that carried last year's fastest riser, rail maker Alstom (59th).

Cement and concrete producers Holcim (43rd) and Heidelberg Materials Australia Group (36th) both grew at a comparatively gentle pace, at 1.7% and 4.1%, respectively. Their demand is contingent on Australia’s pipeline of large transport infrastructure projects, like the Melbourne Metro Tunnel project and the Sydney Metro – Western Sydney Airport project. These projects and similar ones maintain demand for local cement, aggregates and concrete.

Another demand source is home building, which by comparison has been a low point of demand. In the first year of the Federal Government's National Housing Accord, to June 2025, just over 174,000 homes were completed, according to ABS building activity figures, more than one-quarter below the 240,000-a-year pace the target demands. This shortfall kept a lid on demand for many building products.

Standing out more acutely in the sector was Orora, which fell 26 places to 46th position after separating from its North American packaging business. However, the drop is more a reflection of a smaller business than of a weak year: the company’s profit rose sharply, showing that a drop on the list isn’t always indicative of how a business is trading. 


Bar chart titled "Biggest Movers Up and Down the Ranking," showing the change in rank for 12 companies. The subtitle notes that McCain Foods and Prysmian climbed strongly up the ranking, while Pfizer and Orora were among the companies that fell the most steeply. Six companies moved up: McCain Foods (+21 places), Prysmian (+20), Sun Metals (+12), NH Foods (+10), ASC (+10) and NEPEAN (+10). Six companies moved down: Nyrstar (-12), Refuelling Solutions (-13), PepsiCo Foods (-22), Pfizer (-22), Orora (-26) and Unilever (-27), the largest fall on the chart.

Final Word

The 2026 Top 100 Manufacturers List reflects a sector that’s still growing but is increasingly divided into distinct lanes. The gains were concentrated in gold and other metals, defence and companies that grew through acquisitions or mergers. The declines were found in fuel refining, steelmaking and manufacturers that were still running off pandemic-era demand, which has faded. The gap between these groups is what defines the year.

Several questions will shape the future of the manufacturing sector. Whether gold prices can continue to hold or rally to new heights will be decisive for which manufacturer remains at the top. The pace at which defence spending continues, particularly the AUKUS spending, will be crucial for big names. The Future Made in Australia incentives, due from 2027-28, may begin to appear in the results of the metals and clean-energy manufacturers. And a strengthening in home building, if it comes, would lift prospects for building product manufacturers. Automation and artificial intelligence remain slower-moving themes in Australian manufacturing and appear more likely to shape margins over several years than to reshape the ranking in any single year.

Recommended for you

Never miss
a beat

Join Insider Monthly for exclusive data and stories like these, delivered straight to your inbox.

Something went wrong. Please try again later!

Region

Form submitted

One of our representatives will come back to you shortly.

Tap into the largest collection of industry research

  • Scalable membership packages to fit your needs
  • Competitive analysis, financial benchmarks, and more
  • 15 years of market sizing and forecast data