IBISWorld Platform
Answer any industry question in minutes with our entire database at your fingertips.
Answer any industry question in minutes with our entire database at your fingertips.
Feed trusted, human-driven industry intelligence straight into your platform.
Streamline your workflow with IBISWorld’s intelligence built into your toolkit.
IBISWorld's research coverage on the Material Handling Services procurement and pricing environment in the United States includes market dynamics, buyer power scores, supply chain vendors with pricing trends and forecasts.
This procurement coverage of the Material Handling Services market in the United States includes Cargo Weighing Services, Conveyance & Sortation, Manual & Automated Freight Loading & Unloading, Forklift Rentals, Pallet Jack Sales & Leasing, Warehouse Racking Installation, Load Securement Equipment and Crane & Hoist Services. Standard coding in this coverage includes ISIC-5221-Service activities incidental to land transportation, NACE-52.21-Service Activities Incidental To Land Transportation, NAICS-488990-Other support activities for transportation and UNSPSC-78121600-Material handling services.
Common market terminology included in the Material Handling Services procurement coverage includes Containerized Freight (Freight, ranging from automobiles to food to consumer goods, that is uniformly packaged in standard-size containers for intermodal transport.), Quay Crane (A crane used at ports for loading and unloading containers onto and from vessels.) and Third-Party Logistics (The outsourcing of all or much of a company's logistics operations to a specialized company.).
The top companies covered in the Material Handling Services procurement report as suppliers are Bedeschi S.p.A., Hunt J B Transport Services Inc., Kion Group Ag, Ryder System, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc..
The Opportunity Assessment chapter provides a comprehensive market analysis of the Material Handling Services market in the United States category, including buyer power scoring, market pricing trends, vendor landscape, cost structure, and strategic negotiation levers.
The market pricing trends include the Market Price (2026) per hour, a five year price forecast and a supply chain risk score. Vendor coverage includes a market share and cost structure breakdown.
Analysis includes a comprehensive SWOT analysis of and recent developments impacting the Material Handling Services market environment.
The Buyer Power Score chapter assesses key components impacting Material Handling Services procurement including the recent price trend, forecast price trend, availability of substitutes, switching costs, product specialization, average vendor risk, market share concentration, supply chain risk, price driver volatility and recent price volatility.
These components generate a Buyer Power Score that ranges from -5 (strongly favoring sellers) to +5 (strongly favoring buyers) plus a recommended strategy for procurement specialists.
The Price Environment chapter covers detailed pricing analysis and datasets on Material Handling Services market environment. This includes insights into market pricing Market Price (2026), price forecasts, volatility, specialization, substitutes and switching costs.
Datasets in the Price Environment chapter include vendor cost structure, breakdowns of wage rates by geography and specialty, key external economic and labor drivers impacting the market and market pricing models.
The Supply Chain & Vendors chapter covers the concentration, risk and diversity of the Material Handling Services market. This includes datasets on the market’s top suppliers, detailed analysis on the key sourcing risks and supply chain dynamics, with environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations and scores.
The Business Requirements chapter covers vendor relationships, qualifications, service level agreements and key performance indicators. These inputs provide insight into the planning process through the buying lead time, vendor relationship and vendor qualifications. The sourcing process include key RFP elements like an organizational overview, project budget, selection criteria, project schedule, proposal format, inventory control, cost containment, regulation, quality control, distribution and key contract clauses.
More than 6,000 businesses use IBISWorld to shape local and global economies
We were able to supplement our reports with IBISWorld’s information from both a qualitative and quantitative standpoint. All of our reporting now features some level of IBISWorld integration.
IBISWorld delivers the crisp business knowledge we need to drive our business. Whether it be serving up our major clients, winning new business or educating on industry issues, IBISWorld brings real value.
IBISWorld has revolutionised business information — which has proved commercially invaluable to exporters, investors and public policy professionals in Australia and overseas.
When you’re able to speak to clients and be knowledgeable about what they do and the state that they operate in, they’re going to trust you a lot more.
The 2026 benchmark market price for Material Handling Services is $470 per hour. Prices have increased at a CAGR of 0.36 from 2023-26.
The top vendors in the Material Handling Services market include Bedeschi S.p.A., Hunt J B Transport Services Inc., Kion Group Ag, Ryder System, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc..
The top industries supplying the Material Handling Services market are Material Handling Equipment Distributors in the US, Forklift & Conveyor Manufacturing in the US, Computer & Packaged Software Wholesaling in the US, Computer Manufacturing in the US, Software Publishing in the US, Aircraft, Marine & Railroad Transportation Equipment Wholesaling in the US and Engine & Turbine Manufacturing in the US.
Low market share concentration enables buyers to drive competition and secure favorable contract terms . The US material handling services market is highly fragmented, with no single supplier exerting significant control over pricing or contract standards. This competitive landscape gives buyers strong leverage to negotiate lower rates and better service terms by soliciting multiple bids and benchmarking proposals. Procurement teams should capitalize on this supplier diversity by regularly re-competing contracts and leveraging competitive tension to extract added value and innovation from vendors.
Established providers with strong reputations can command premium rates due to perceived reliability and quality, often measured through customer reviews, industry awards, and market share.