IBISWorld Platform
Answer any industry question in minutes with our entire database at your fingertips.
Answer any industry question in minutes with our entire database at your fingertips.
Feed trusted, human-driven industry intelligence straight into your platform.
Streamline your workflow with IBISWorld’s intelligence built into your toolkit.
IBISWorld's research coverage on the Agricultural Tractors procurement and pricing environment in the United States includes market dynamics, buyer power scores, supply chain vendors with pricing trends and forecasts.
This procurement coverage of the Agricultural Tractors market in the United States includes Subcompact Tractors, Compact Tractors, Utility Tractors, High-Horsepower Tractors, New Tractors and Used Tractors. Standard coding in this coverage includes HS-8701-Tractors; (Other Than Tractors Of Heading No 8709), ISIC-2821-Manufacture of agricultural and forestry machinery, NACE-28.30-Manufacture Of Agricultural And Forestry Machinery, NAICS-333110-Agricultural implement manufacturing and UNSPSC-25101901-Agricultural tractors.
Common market terminology included in the Agricultural Tractors procurement coverage includes Power Take-Off (PTO) (An attachment point that provides power to an outside attachment. Tractors are available with different numbers and types of power take-off points.), Combine (An agricultural vehicle specifically designed to harvest large areas of crops.), Disking (Cultivating soil with a disk harrow, a narrow metal disk that is usually attached to a tractor and dragged along the ground.), Harrowing (Dragging a series of metal tines over the ground to remove weeds, break up dirt clumps and cover seeds.) and Wheelbase (Often used to measure the length of a tractor, the wheelbase is the distance from the center of the front wheel to the center of the rear wheel.).
The top companies covered in the Agricultural Tractors procurement report as suppliers are SDF SpA, Tong Yang Moolsan Co. Ltd., Caterpillar Inc., Argo Tractors SpA and Daedong Industrial Co. Ltd..
The Opportunity Assessment chapter provides a comprehensive market analysis of the Agricultural Tractors market in the United States category, including buyer power scoring, market pricing trends, vendor landscape, cost structure, and strategic negotiation levers.
The market pricing trends include the Market Price (2026) per tractor, a five year price forecast and a supply chain risk score. Vendor coverage includes a market share and cost structure breakdown.
Analysis includes a comprehensive SWOT analysis of and recent developments impacting the Agricultural Tractors market environment.
The Buyer Power Score chapter assesses key components impacting Agricultural Tractors procurement including the recent price trend, forecast price trend, availability of substitutes, switching costs, product specialization, average vendor risk, market share concentration, supply chain risk, price driver volatility and recent price volatility.
These components generate a Buyer Power Score that ranges from -5 (strongly favoring sellers) to +5 (strongly favoring buyers) plus a recommended strategy for procurement specialists.
The Price Environment chapter covers detailed pricing analysis and datasets on Agricultural Tractors market environment. This includes insights into market pricing Market Price (2026), price forecasts, volatility, specialization, substitutes and switching costs.
Datasets in the Price Environment chapter include vendor cost structure, breakdowns of wage rates by geography and specialty, key external economic and labor drivers impacting the market and market pricing models.
The Supply Chain & Vendors chapter covers the concentration, risk and diversity of the Agricultural Tractors market. This includes datasets on the market’s top suppliers, detailed analysis on the key sourcing risks and supply chain dynamics, with environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations and scores.
The Business Requirements chapter covers vendor relationships, qualifications, service level agreements and key performance indicators. These inputs provide insight into the planning process through the buying lead time, vendor relationship and vendor qualifications. The sourcing process include key RFP elements like an organizational overview, project budget, selection criteria, project schedule, proposal format, inventory control, cost containment, regulation, quality control, distribution and key contract clauses.
More than 6,000 businesses use IBISWorld to shape local and global economies
We were able to supplement our reports with IBISWorld’s information from both a qualitative and quantitative standpoint. All of our reporting now features some level of IBISWorld integration.
IBISWorld delivers the crisp business knowledge we need to drive our business. Whether it be serving up our major clients, winning new business or educating on industry issues, IBISWorld brings real value.
IBISWorld has revolutionised business information — which has proved commercially invaluable to exporters, investors and public policy professionals in Australia and overseas.
When you’re able to speak to clients and be knowledgeable about what they do and the state that they operate in, they’re going to trust you a lot more.
The 2026 benchmark market price for Agricultural Tractors is $239000 per tractor. Prices have declined at a CAGR of -2.33 from 2023-26.
The top vendors in the Agricultural Tractors market include SDF SpA, Tong Yang Moolsan Co. Ltd., Caterpillar Inc., Argo Tractors SpA and Daedong Industrial Co. Ltd..
The top industries supplying the Agricultural Tractors market are Circuit Board & Electronic Component Manufacturing in the US, Semiconductor & Circuit Manufacturing in the US, Engine & Turbine Manufacturing in the US, Metalworking Machinery Manufacturing in the US, Ferrous Metal Foundry Products in the US, Iron & Steel Manufacturing in the US, Tire Wholesaling in the US and Tire Manufacturing in the US.
High concentration gives major manufacturers significant pricing influence. The agricultural tractor market is dominated by a few global firms—Deere & Company, CNH Industrial, AGCO, and Mahindra—collectively accounting for nearly three-quarters of total sales. This high market share concentration restricts buyer leverage and enables top manufacturers to maintain strong control over pricing. While buyers may find some flexibility at the dealer level, negotiating large-scale price concessions from OEMs remains challenging in this concentrated landscape.
Age significantly affects the pricing of agricultural tractors, as newer models typically feature advanced technology, better fuel efficiency, and enhanced performance, leading to higher prices. Additionally, new tractors are priced at a premium compared to used tractors because the buyer faces a greater level of uncertainty over the condition of the tractor when purchasing a used tractor.